HAWAIʻI FIRST

Condemning the Techno-Industrial-Military-Petrochemical–Space Complex

President Dwight Eisenhower has been proven to be prescient.

When President Dwight Eisenhower left office in 1961, he warned the nation about something new: the “military-industrial complex.” He meant the powerful alliance between weapons manufacturers, military leaders, and politicians who were turning war into a business. At the time, his warning seemed sharp, but today it looks almost too small. What once was the Military-Industrial Complex has grown into something even bigger and more dangerous: the Techno-Industrial-Military-Petrochemical–Space Complex.

This beast isn’t just about bombs and tanks. It stretches across Silicon Valley’s data centers, the oil fields of the Middle East, the skies filled with surveillance drones, and even the new space race led by billionaires. It fuses war, oil, technology, and outer space into one global machine that feeds on money, power, and control. And the worst part? The costs fall on ordinary people and on the planet itself.

The old Military-Industrial Complex was notorious for waste and fraud. In 2015, the Pentagon revealed that it could not account for $6.5 trillion in funds, and even its newest weapons—like the F-35 fighter jet—were delivered late, over budget, and underperforming.¹ The Department of Defense still tops the Federal Contractor Misconduct Database, showing how common corruption is in the system.² But the problem isn’t just inefficiency. It’s that this machine creates endless war. The U.S. spends more on its military than the next seven countries combined,³ yet it has lost more wars than it has won since World War II.

After 9/11, the war machine linked up with Silicon Valley. The government created what some call an “intelligence industrial complex,” pouring billions into surveillance, data-mining, and artificial intelligence.⁴ Companies like Amazon, Google, and Palantir now sell services to both consumers and the Pentagon. The same tools used to recommend your next video or deliver your groceries are used to track, target, and control people. This isn’t science fiction; it’s happening now.⁵

Meanwhile, space—the so-called “final frontier”—is being turned into a battlefield. Private companies like SpaceX and Blue Origin sell themselves as pioneers of human destiny, promising life on Mars. But much of their business depends on Pentagon contracts, launching satellites that serve military purposes.⁶ Starlink, Elon Musk’s satellite network, has already been used for warfare in Ukraine.⁷ What looks like exploration is really militarization, with corporations carving up the skies just like empires once carved up continents.

All of this depends on oil. The U.S. military is the single largest institutional consumer of petroleum on Earth, producing more greenhouse gases than entire nations.⁸ It fights wars over oil fields, while its ships, jets, and tanks guarantee we remain hooked on fossil fuels. The petrochemical industry, meanwhile, poisons aquifers, soils, and reefs, wrapping plastic around every part of daily life. Together, the war machine and the oil machine are burning the planet’s future.

Eisenhower warned that the military-industrial complex might bankrupt the nation. The Techno-Industrial-Military-Petrochemical–Space Complex goes further. It threatens to bankrupt the planet itself. This is no longer about choosing between “guns and butter,” as people used to say. It is about choosing between life and extinction. Every trillion dollars spent on weapons is money not spent on healthcare, housing, education, or restoring ecosystems. Every rocket launch, every drone strike, every oil spill accelerates collapse.

The truth is stark: this complex does not keep us safe. It does not build peace. It feeds itself while stripping life from the Earth. If we want a livable future, it is not enough to tinker at the edges. We need to challenge this system at its roots. Young people especially must see through the lies: that militarism means security, that oil means prosperity, that technology means freedom, or that space colonization means hope. These are myths sold to keep the machine running.

What Eisenhower feared has already come true, only larger. Unless we resist, the Techno-Industrial-Military-Petrochemical–Space Complex will not just dominate our politics—it will decide the fate of our planet. The choice is whether we let it, or whether we build something else.


Notes

  1. U.S. Department of Defense Office of the Inspector General, Army General Fund Adjustments Not Adequately Documented or Supported, July 26, 2016.
  2. Project on Government Oversight (POGO), Federal Contractor Misconduct Database, accessed August 2025.
  3. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), SIPRI Military Expenditure Database 2024.
  4. Dana Priest and William Arkin, Top Secret America: The Rise of the New American Security State (New York: Little, Brown, 2011).
  5. Yasha Levine, Surveillance Valley: The Secret Military History of the Internet (New York: PublicAffairs, 2018).
  6. Loren Grush, “SpaceX, Blue Origin, and the Pentagon: The New Military-Space Race,” The Verge, March 2019.
  7. John Reed, “Starlink and the Ukraine War,” Financial Times, February 2023.
  8. Neta C. Crawford, Pentagon Fuel Use, Climate Change, and the Costs of War (Brown University: Costs of War Project, 2019).

3 responses to “Condemning the Techno-Industrial-Military-Petrochemical–Space Complex”

  1. Do you send any of these to elected people or the Star Advertiser or Civil Beat?

    Tanya
    Freedom lies in being bold. Robert Frost

    1. I have submitted to Civil Beat but they have never responded.

  2. Bill Blackstone Avatar
    Bill Blackstone

    So true  “Together, the war machine and the oil machine are burning the planet’s future.”

    Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer

Leave a comment